I’ve been reading John Traxler’s piece on mobile learning. Becta describes these articles on emerging technologies as research reports, but they are not. Should we leave them to their own devices is really a thought-provoking essay that recycles some ideas and develops others. A strong feature of Traxler’s paper is the wristwatch analogy. But the comparison of the wristwatch with newer portable digital devices also highlights a weakness in the argument. A watch is essentially a portable information device which is of course very useful in co-ordinating our social interactions; on the other hand a mobile phone develops this by adding one-to-one communication, and now many-to-many communication, again very useful in co-ordinating and enacting social interactions. But is the mobile a learning device? Is the watch a learning device? I think Traxler confuses information and communication with learning. Of course learning arises out of communication; but it is not the same thing as communication. Similarly knowledge cannot simply be described as content. So, the real issue continues to be one of how digital communication can be utilised to develop learning. Mobile or static, we need a pedagogy that includes the digital or else we are just grasping at straws
2015-12-21keyun
ReplyDeletenike trainers sale
tiffany jewelry
ugg boots sale
ugg clearance outlet
beats by dre
nike air max
coach factory outlet
tory burch outlet online
louis vuitton outlet
ugg slippers
celine handbags
ugg sale
coach outlet online
canada goose outlet
tods outlet store
timberlands
oakley sunglasses sale
vans sneakers
cheap ray ban sunglasses
hollister
abercrombie
coach factory outlet online
coach outlet
cheap jordans
ralph lauren outlet
retro 11
cheap rolex watches
fake oakley sunglasses
ugg boots
louis vuitton
toms
ray ban sunglasses
coach outlet store
ray-ban sunglasses
ugg boots on sale
michael kors outlet clearance
jordan concords
north face jackets
abercrombie
michaek kors
uggs outlet